For some reason my Facebook feed has been dominated by little videos from the DfE advertising teaching as a career. They’re all quite similar, featuring some young, fresh and sparkly eyed 20-something talking about how wonderful teaching is as a career. They use words like “inspire” and phrases like “make a difference.” Fantastic. Teachers inspire students. They inspire them to love a subject, to passionately delve into its higher realms, to transcend the constraints of their low-expectation-filled backgrounds, to be their best possible selves and to stand on chairs and call “oh captain my captain!” Students across the UK are apparently guided and coached by charismatic and dynamic teachers who are up to date with the latest trends, fashionably nerdy and infinitely approachable for when they’ve just got to have that “deep meaningful chat” with all the feels. Brilliant.
I think a lot of people have probably pointed out that in reality this isn’t what teaching is like. Day to day, it’s just a rinse and repeat of delivering your subject to tired teenagers ranging from the genuinely engaged to the generally disaffected right down to the outright resentful. That’s all true, and if you think you are going to spend every day inspiring children to love Shakespeare, become female science Nobel Prize winners or you’re going to fix their mental health issues with the power of your chats – you are probably wrong, and you shouldn’t enter into teaching on that pretence.
But I think there is another side to that coin, one seen from the perspective of the teacher. Some people are indeed naturally inspiring. They’ve achieved amazing things and somehow just being in their presence makes you want to be better. Without even knowing them well you don’t want to let them down, you want them to notice you, to recognise you and to, in a sense, raise you up. You get sucked in to their orbit. But most people aren’t like that. Most people – and in this I include most teachers and myself – are just normal, boring people. Personally, I don’t think that’s a bad thing. It’s just a thing. It’s reality.
I don’t think of my job as being to inspire people. Some of my students sure, I want to try and encourage them to really love my subject and go on to study it. Do I have low expectations when I confess that for most of my students I don’t really think that? They turn up in the morning and study my subject to pass their exam. I’m kind of fine with that, it’s realistic. Maybe if I teach them brilliantly they will love the subject more and maybe they will go on to study it further. But maybe – probably – they won’t. I teach them because the content is their right and their heritage, whether they like it or not. And yeah, because they need to pass an exam. The fact that I don’t think I can inspire them all to love chemistry and go off to study at university isn’t really about them, it’s about me. I don’t think I’m that person. Sure, a large part of my role is more modest; inculcating good habits, modelling politeness, patience, openness and all the other Good Things. But I don’t think that’s what people mean when they say “inspire.” Which leaves me right back with my first question: what if I’m just not that inspiring?
December 7, 2017 at 8:09 pm
Fantastic stuff.
Immediately when I read your post, I thought of this recent piece from Scott Alexander, titled Different Worlds. A choice excerpt:
Read the whole post, it’s great, and not unrelated to what you’re thinking about here.
Learning styles, right? They’re bunk. And what about teaching styles? Well there certainly are some arts or skills where style and personality play an ineliminable role. But is teaching one of those, or is it more like (I don’t know) car maintenance, where an optimal procedure is largely knowable (even if it’s not commonly known)?
I do think that teaching style is a real thing for reasons related to what you describe in this post. Personality matters. Hey, if I could be really inspiring I would love that. Kids would love my class, and I bet I could still get them to learn the stuff they need to learn. But that’s just not my personality. I’m not an inspiration machine. What I am is a sort of self-deprecation, listening and thoughtful activity choosing machine, so that’s what I tend to emphasize in my teaching.
Of course, there are things that I’m working on. I’m not naturally a really fascinating speaker, but I’d like to get better at my spoken explanations. I’d love to be more riveting. I’d love for kids to feel more warmth than I’m naturally capable of giving. I want to be kinder, firmer, smarter, better, etc.
But personality simply is a part of how we teach. Understanding this would make us a lot more tolerant of people who see teaching in ways that we don’t, and I think that would be a very good thing.
(But then again I would say that, given my personality, wouldn’t I?)
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 7, 2017 at 8:29 pm
Another fantastic comment Mr Pershan.
LikeLike
January 5, 2018 at 1:55 pm
Reblogged this on The Echo Chamber.
LikeLike
January 27, 2018 at 6:41 pm
The students inspire me far more often than I inspire them!
LikeLike