All the cool kids seem to be making knowledge organisers. So I thought I would have a crack at making one myself.
The idea for knowledge organisers started with Joe Kirby’s blog on the topic (Olivia Dyer’s science ones can be found here). I know that mine doesn’t really look like theirs and I’ve tried to explain why below.
PDF version: covalent-bonding
There’s been a lot of discussion about them online and I’ve summarised some of the pros and cons that I’ve seen bandied around:
Pros:
Gives the students “meticulous” detail of what they need to know
Regular use + quizzing aids retrieval practice
Excellent for student revision
Any visitors to the class can quickly and easily see what students are learning and how that fits in the medium term
New teachers can easily work out what they need to teach
Cons (1):
Very dry
Can lead to the knowledge being thought of as “disconnected facts”
Not really “organised”
These last two are kind of connected. The information needs to be presented in a way such that the whole is seen and not just the dismembered parts.
Another thing which is interesting if you look at Olivia’s is that she has started incorporating diagrams. In science we use a lot of diagrams to better explain complicated, abstract topics (2). So I have added some diagrams to mine too and they are the same ones we used in class which should help as well.
I’ve also actually tried to organise the knowledge. I don’t know much about other subjects, but in science we’re constantly building on prior knowledge and using that to make sense of the new material to be covered. You cannot understand covalent structures unless you understand covalent bonding. Which you cannot understand unless you understand atomic structure. And so on and so forth.
I’ve also not stuck to the term/definition structure of most KO’s I’ve seen. My students have access to things a bit more along that line on my Quizlet page. But even there, I prefer question/answer format to term/definition. I think it can be prettily easily utilised as a source of low-stakes retrieval practice based quizzing.
I’ve also kept in quite a bit of teacher guidance but have given students some bits and pieces that they need to do themselves. This is because I wanted to give them the stuff which I thought they would get wrong if I had them do it themselves (or at the very least not be able to achieve the same meticulousness of detail), but also a lot of our students have been quite spoon fed and I want to maintain at least the illusion of students having to put in some work themselves.
Anyway I’ve bastardised the basic format so much that it probably doesn’t even count as a Knowledge Organiser. But, like others, I quite enjoyed the process and it’s certainly helped my understanding of the unit.
Please let me know if you have any feedback!
NB this is for the AQA Chemistry 2016+ course.
1 Some people have a general problem with teaching knowledge. I don’t so haven’t included it here.
2 For more references on this see here. The cognitive scientists call this dual coding or multimedia instruction.
January 9, 2017 at 9:10 pm
I also found the most valuable part of the process was getting to know the unit of work really, really well — and the challenge of expressing things in the most concise form possible!
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 9, 2017 at 10:46 pm
Can they use the knowledge organiser in the test or the assessment of the unit? I think they should be able to. http://wp.me/p7GGfg-ex
LikeLike
January 9, 2017 at 10:50 pm
Interesting idea. I think a firm grasp of the knowledge is what enables students to craft answers to the “higher order” questions. The whole point of the KO is to automatise the process of supplementing “thinking” with deep, ordered knowledge. Google is no substitute for deep understanding of the relevant facts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 9, 2017 at 11:35 pm
I am not saying don’t teach the children about the Apollo 11 mission. I am not saying let them google everything themselves. I am saying memorizing dates and minor facts is not necessary and stops us getting through more of the big ideas in the unit.
An example of a HO question. Why was the the particular site chosen for the lunar landing?
In the answer you would expect students to mention the name of the landing module (Eagle) and the name of the landing site (Bay of Tranquility).
LikeLike
January 9, 2017 at 10:53 pm
I think it’s important that the content’s memorised – the more automatically students can recall this the easier future topics are to teach e.g. addition-elimination reaction mechanisms in Y13 are much easier if students fully understand covalent bonding and what it means when they draw curly arrows moving ‘up to an oxygen’ in a carbonyl group.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 2, 2017 at 12:10 pm
Reblogged this on The Echo Chamber.
LikeLike
July 9, 2017 at 10:00 am
I think this is great. It gives students some scaffold to help them increase in confid nice and then opportunity to have a go themselves. Brilliant.
LikeLike